| Home | |
| Attorneys | |
| Contact Us | |
| Site Map | |
|
Subscribe |
![]() | ![]() |
|
3905 Vincennes Road
Suite 204 Indianapolis, IN 46268 (317) 704-2400 (317) 704-2410 |
|
|
Posted by: John Gilliland A timely example is the current controversy concerning the U.S. Department of Justices firing of eight United States Attorneys. Totally aside from the question of whether or not those dismissals should have occurred (we will try to be non-political on this blog), the situation illustrates how what is in an employees personnel file makes a difference in the event of discharge. From press reports, it appears the Department of Justice claims the eight attorneys were discharged due to poor performance. However, at least some of their personnel files apparently are not consistent with that charge. If so, the Department of Justice should have consulted an employment lawyer before giving poor performance as the reason. It happens so often - a discrimination or other wrongful discharge suit is filed against an employer. The employer says the discharge was not due to unlawful discrimination or other reason. Rather, the employer is adamant that the employees discharge was due to poor performance. One of the first things the employers employment lawyer will do is ask to see the employees personnel file. All too often, the employers poor performance defense is not supported by what is in the personnel file. There is nothing to document poor performance. Indeed, just the opposite is often the case - the employees file contains glowing performance reviews. In this situation, what would you believe - the employers self-serving claims of poor performance or the documents in the employees personnel file? Accurate and complete documentation of an employees performance is one of the most valuable things an employer can do to successfully defend claims of discrimination or other wrongful discharge. The written documentation will speak much louder and more forcefully than anything the employer later says verbally. Of course, giving good performance reviews and ignoring progressive discipline is much easier than being honest and pointing out areas of needed improvement. However, unless what is said is true, it will come back to haunt. When evaluating an employees performance, be honest and accurate. You are doing no one any favors when you pretend an employees performance is good when it is not. Think about it - aside from how inaccurate documentation can come back to haunt, how is an employee expected to improve his or her performance if you arent honest in identifying areas of needed improvement? |
NewsHealth Care
[07/02] UnitedHealth cuts 4,000 jobs and 2008 outlook Recent UpdatesMarch 06, 2008 February 26, 2008 February 14, 2008 February 08, 2008 January 25, 2008 ArchivesWeb ResourcesFindLaw |
|
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Copyright © 2008 by Home Care Employment Law Blog. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. |