Posted by: John Gilliland
June 26, 2007
Topic: Labor

This morning the United States Senate defeated the "Employee Free Choice Act." That Act was strongly supported by organized labor and would have required an employer to recognize a union if the employer was presented with union cards signed by a majority of their employees in an appropriate bargaining unit. It would have short circuited the usual way a union is recognized which is by a secret ballot election.

I get a kick out how bills are titled. The "Employee Free Choice Act"? Come on. The original Labor Management Relations Act enacted back in the 1930s was Congress' effort to end crippling strikes for union recognition occurring back then. A basic concept of that law was to put democracy in the workplace by requiring employees to vote in secret concerning whether or not they want a union.

The so-called "Employee Free Choice Act" would turn that concept on its head by ignoring the intimidation and misinformation that can lead an employee to sign a union card. Just as in our election for government officials, the secret ballot election allows an individual to express his or her true choice, not one that has been coerced.

But, actually, what really came to my mind as I read about the "Employee Free Choice Act" is a question I liked to ask on exams when I taught a graduate level labor law course at a midwestern university many years ago. That question was, "Is there such a thing as a neutral labor law?" I did not care whether the student answered yes or no. What I cared about mostly was the reasoning they used to support their positions.

Most of the students concluded there is no such thing as a neutral labor law. That is my own position as well.

Whatever change is made to labor law tends to benefit either the employer or the union. While all changes are argued to be for fairness, they all come down to either the employer or the union trying to achieve a change that benefits them.

Take the "Employee Free Choice Act." It has nothing to do with an employee's free choice. As our own political system establishes, a secret ballot election is a hallmark of freedom. The "Employee Free Choice Act" is nothing more than a recognition by unions that they are losing many elections these days. What better way to increase their chances of winning than to do away with the secret ballot.

News

Health Care

[07/02] UnitedHealth cuts 4,000 jobs and 2008 outlook
[07/02] US contradicts itself over its own ID theft advice
[07/02] Center for medical intelligence expanding
[07/02] Salmonella probe adds foods served with tomatoes
[07/01] Dueling ads pressure Congress on Medicare
[06/26] Fidelity: $85k needed for long-term care costs
[06/25] Health insurance lags most in Southwest, CDC says
[06/24] Jury begins deliberating in Ky. diet drug case
[06/11] Why did food sellers treat tomatoes like hot potatoes?
[06/10] Tomatoes pulled off shelves amid salmonella scare
Read More

Web Resources

FindLaw
Thomson West
U.S. Courts
Westlaw
United States Chamber of Commerce
FirstGov
Legislative Branch
Library of Congress
White House
Internal Revenue Service
National Weather Service
Yahoo!Maps
YellowPages.com
New York Times
Newspapers Online
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
AOL
Google
Yahoo!Legal Blog Directory